registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by pa b0whunt3r, February 27, 2012, 01:55:47 PM
Quote from: BurrisOptics on April 23, 2012, 10:48:47 AMI shot 2 birds this year using both the FF2 w/ 4moa dot and with the new FF3 w/ 8 moa dot. Both of them worked very well as I expected. One thing I noticed about the 8 moa was that if you stretch the distance a bit you can quickly tell. The dot size is very noticeable at the longer distances. Both birds were at my longest comfortable shooting distance but with the 8 I knew it immediately. I don't know if that's beneficial to most people but I kind of liked it. I had no problems putting an accurate shot on either bird. Just something to think about.
Quote from: Sand Man on April 23, 2012, 05:34:19 PMQuote from: BurrisOptics on April 23, 2012, 10:48:47 AMI shot 2 birds this year using both the FF2 w/ 4moa dot and with the new FF3 w/ 8 moa dot. Both of them worked very well as I expected. One thing I noticed about the 8 moa was that if you stretch the distance a bit you can quickly tell. The dot size is very noticeable at the longer distances. Both birds were at my longest comfortable shooting distance but with the 8 I knew it immediately. I don't know if that's beneficial to most people but I kind of liked it. I had no problems putting an accurate shot on either bird. Just something to think about. Interesting and a perspective I've never even thought about. So, if I'm understanding you correctly, based off the size of the dot in relation to the turkeys head/neck you could more accurately judge his distance?
Quote from: Spuriosity on May 24, 2012, 10:32:22 PM. Don't like the idea of obscuring the entire head on a close shot. Not saying the 8 won't do fine; it's just not my cup of tea.
Quote from: Spuriosity on May 24, 2012, 10:32:22 PMBought a FF III a couple of weeks ago with the 3 MOA dot. Haven't used it on a turkey yet, but I am loving it at the range. No problems seeing the dot in any light conditions, including looking into the morning sun. Can't see any good reason to go with the 8. Don't like the idea of obscuring the entire head on a close shot. Not saying the 8 won't do fine; it's just not my cup of tea.
Quote from: mudhen on May 25, 2012, 01:26:15 PMSince I don't aim at the head, and have never liked the cover method, the 8 works better for me. Even my 4 bounces around a little bit, and a 3 would have been even smaller.In the field, the 8 doesn't cover the head of any of my targets, so I'm not worried about it in the least.