registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by Greg Massey, March 22, 2021, 09:39:48 PM
Quote from: Hwd silvestris on March 22, 2021, 10:09:37 PMDepending on how hard it has been cut. When cut too hard it allows too much sunlight on the forest floor therefore it gets super thick with underbrush and this will have a negative impact. Generally speaking a first thinning on a pine plantation will produce positive results hands down. Hwd select cut is kinda same principal. If cut too hard it will have a negative affect. In short, depending on circumstances. That's just my opinion. I'm no biologist but I'm a turkey hunting fanatic and I'm in the logging/timber/forestry industry. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: zeke632 on March 23, 2021, 12:56:44 AMI not in favor of it. After the first year small saplings take over. When they leaf out you can't see. Then they grow into thickets that are miserable. I think select cuts are one of several problems causing declining numbers.
Quote from: Dtrkyman on March 23, 2021, 09:39:54 AMGobblenut any chance those birds moved? Or was it too big an area? That dry climate is harsh!
Quote from: Southernson13 on March 23, 2021, 09:57:53 AMQuote from: zeke632 on March 23, 2021, 12:56:44 AMI not in favor of it. After the first year small saplings take over. When they leaf out you can't see. Then they grow into thickets that are miserable. I think select cuts are one of several problems causing declining numbers.Well sir you would be dead wrong. NWTF and QDMA have both adopted the same management principle that encourages selective cutting to promote game habitat. The problem is that many landowners, seemingly yourself included, don't continue the rest of the management. You cannot cause disturbance in a forest then just let it do what it does. A forest is like a toddler. It has to be watched and encouraged. The second part to selective thinning is that there be some form of midstory management. This management is accomplished with either burning or spraying with the former being promoted as the ideal option.I should have explained my opinion more thoroughly. The select cuts I refer to are on National Forest lands... places where turkeys flourished and are now gone. I agree with you 100% in how the land needs to be managed afterwards. Those practices don't happen here. The USFS posts signs on several large tracts of land to be burned every year...sometimes the controlled burns happen, sometimes they don't. It's typically many many years between burns, if ever. Most signs stay up until they rot off. We have big checker board areas that are old growth, next to nothing more than huge briar thickets. I'm not a biologist nor a forestry expert. My opinion comes from what I have witnessed. And as I mentioned, I don't believe it is the only problem contributing to the problem of low turkey populations. But it's one of them...no doubt in mind