registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by silvestris, July 27, 2018, 11:53:24 PM
Quote from: guesswho on July 30, 2018, 04:37:45 PMQuote from: GobbleNut on July 29, 2018, 11:42:51 PMI'm still smarter than some West Virginia and Alablama boys I know around here... Anybody I know?
Quote from: GobbleNut on July 29, 2018, 11:42:51 PMI'm still smarter than some West Virginia and Alablama boys I know around here...
Quote from: GobbleNut on July 30, 2018, 09:05:11 AMQuote from: deerhunt1988 on July 30, 2018, 06:13:21 AMOne thing I've failed to see mentioned in this thread is how the bulk of wildlife conservation is funded: through excise taxes on hunting/fishing equipment, guns and ammo, and the sale of hunting/fishing licenses. Less hunters, less spending, less money towards wildlife conservation. So those of you who are having second thoughts on hunter recruitment, be careful what you wish for. I personally have nothing against recruiting new hunters. If a kid or adult decides they want to go hunting, that's great. ...But that has to be balanced with the fact that too much of a good thing is detrimental to both our wildlife resources and the hunting community, in general. The human hunting pressure that can be placed on our wildlife is finite. There is a tipping point.To me, having a smaller number of dedicated hunters/conservationists that understand wildlife management and the role of hunting in our world is better than having ten times that many with 90% of them looking at hunting as nothing more than a real-life video game. Your statement regarding the issue of who pays for wildlife conservation is right on target. We most certainly have outgrown the concept of hunters and fishermen paying for everything. It is high time that other funding mechanisms be investigated and implemented that include everybody, hunters and non-hunters alike. (Some states have implemented a general-fund, tax earmark for this,...and it seems to be working out just fine as far as I know)The "double-edged sword" in that concept, however, is that by getting everybody involved in paying for wildlife conservation, you bring the anti-hunters and anti-leaning non-hunters to the management table. That has its own inherent risks, but for me personally, that is better than flooding the woods with the real-life, video game players who, other than pulling the trigger, don't do one positive thing for wildlife conservation,...or hunter's image.
Quote from: deerhunt1988 on July 30, 2018, 06:13:21 AMOne thing I've failed to see mentioned in this thread is how the bulk of wildlife conservation is funded: through excise taxes on hunting/fishing equipment, guns and ammo, and the sale of hunting/fishing licenses. Less hunters, less spending, less money towards wildlife conservation. So those of you who are having second thoughts on hunter recruitment, be careful what you wish for.
Quote from: quavers59 on August 12, 2018, 12:45:09 PMPublic Land here in New York and New Jersey seems to get tougher by the year. More hunters yes-- but also plenty more hikers. I am a hiker also. Alot of hikers are getting out super early in Spring, Summer, and the Fall as well. Hikers know if they get out very early- they will see more wildlife. Something new, I am seeing is hikers bring their dogs and let them off the leash on a trail. Not good for Turkey hunters Spring or Fall.
Quote from: Bolandstrutters on September 05, 2018, 08:08:46 AMSide X Sides have all but ruined the Black Hills in SD. I guess the state saw the dollar signs and decided hunting wasn't as profitable. They've put trails on every acre of that national forest it seems.