Dymondwood vs spectraply

[Weathered-Branch]

So it seems as if Dymondwood was almost the gold standard for strikers but since their factory fir a few years ago I can't seem to find a source. So how does spectraply stack up as a substitute for strikers?

[M,Yingling]

don't waste your time or money on spectraply  for striker ,,,, webb wood  or frog wood is way to go

[Weathered-Branch]

I hadn't ever heard of either of those, but I like the look of their stuff on their websites. Thanks a bunch

[M,Yingling]

good luck !! give them call they will let u know what most guys are using for strikers

[doublespurs21]

wouldn't webbwood and frogwood be the same thing, but with different names??

[Greg Massey]

You want find a better striker than Rutland diamondwood , Frog wood is close , but still not true Rutland diamondwood.

[JLH]

wouldn't webbwood and frogwood be the same thing, but with different names??

No....totally different process.

Each laminate conpany as their own "ingredients" and process for laminating.

Also the density of the product has everyrhing to do with the sound youre getting from it.

There are 2 types of Frogwwod.....the regular Frogwood and they have Frogwood RDH5.....the RDH5 is their high density version.

The good thing about Frogwood is that it is all made in the USA

[B Rogers]

don't waste your time or money on spectraply  for striker ,,,, webb wood  or frog wood is way to go

X2...I have a few pieces of spectraply that I attempted a duck call barrel from. Used 1/4-1/2 bottle of CA on the finish. It just kept soaking it in. It's very soft/porous material.

[BigSlam51]

Weigh a blank of frogwood and rutland, quite the difference. I'll take a rutland dymondwood all day long. Dymalux don't make a bad striker though.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk