Battle of the Crystals

[Footballer]

Which call do you think sounds better? 1 or 2? I'll reveal the calls later...

https://youtu.be/lkqzSyOHEdM


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CMBOSTC]

I'd have to go with #1. Their clucks are both a little high pitch for my liking but #2 is too high IMO. Awesome yelps from both though.

[southern_leo]

I like both and the front end is very similar on both. Audio files are hard to hear small details but 1 sounds like it breaks harder on the back end.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

[yelpy]

#2 sounds familiar.

[Jbird22]

I like #1 better due to clucks and a little more back end on the yelps. Just my $.02...

[Snood Life]

I would go with 2

[strutstopper]

#2 would be my pick

[jjnfla]

I like #2,guessing a mistress

[compton30]

This may sound weird, but I thought YOU sounded better on call 2 than call 1. As in your timing, cadence and everything seemed more crisp to me. That made me prefer call 2. Maybe I'm just imagining things.

Both sound great though.

[chbarnha]

#2

[golfernash]

#1
It has a better roll over to the yelp

[southern_leo]

I'm gonna bet this is mm2 vs CM. Would be crazy to hear a blind test of the mm1 and 2. This is fun, post more lol. The suspense is killing me.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

[Rufus]

#2... just sounds better to me

[Footballer]

And the big reveal:

#1 Zinks Thunder Ridge Crystal

#2 Halloran MM2

Both using a Halloran ipe striker

$30 call v. $85 call


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Footballer]

This may sound weird, but I thought YOU sounded better on call 2 than call 1. As in your timing, cadence and everything seemed more crisp to me. That made me prefer call 2. Maybe I'm just imagining things.

Both sound great though.

That makes sense! I'll try to keep them the same in the future.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk