only use regular PayPal to provide purchase protection
Started by WAGinVA, February 21, 2017, 09:29:41 AM
Quote from: bbcoach on February 23, 2017, 10:00:36 AMQuote from: Blong on February 22, 2017, 09:25:59 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 22, 2017, 08:51:08 PMQuote from: Happy on February 22, 2017, 08:25:13 PMNo matter what actually happened it is still the fellow behind the guns fault. Gun safety goes a long way. Is crawling behind a fan a good Idea? In my opinion no. But I don't condone gobbling either. People get shot just by moving their hands while calling. I hate to hear of anyone getting shot. There is no justification for not knowing your target. Sent from my SM-G800R4 using TapatalkExactly! While I would not feel safe doing it, and have never tried it (PA law is hunting by calling only) it is still insanely stupid to take a shot without knowing your target. I was taught to positively identity not one but several parts of an animal before even thinking of shooting. A few years ago an acquaintance killed a hen in the spring season. He said he heard a bird gobble and then saw something that "looked like a turkey" in the brush so he shot it. I told him he's lucky it wasn't another hunter that he shot. He didn't think that he did anything wrong! In the end, there is no excuse for not identifying your target. Not just the fan. The whole dang turkey!Have you ever shot one in the mountains when he peeps his head over? I have many times and will again I hope.Blong, With people like you in the woods, this is why people get shot. You have broken 2 cardinal rules of hunting. First you didn't verify your target. You said HE sticks his head up over a hill. You don't know if it is a he or she or someone with a fan because you are only seeing the head. Two, you can not be sure that this bird has a visible beard (and most states require only killing birds with visible beards). You hear gobbling and you get caught up in the excitement of the hunt and shoot at a head. NOPE. My 2 cents. As far as fanning, I wouldn't do it but I don't think it should be regulated. We hunters need to verify our targets, make sure we follow the rules already in place and practice all the safety rules that apply to hunting. NO hunter should be shot at the expense of, "I thought it was a Turkey." Get him out in the WIDE open and make sure or let him WALK!
Quote from: Blong on February 22, 2017, 09:25:59 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 22, 2017, 08:51:08 PMQuote from: Happy on February 22, 2017, 08:25:13 PMNo matter what actually happened it is still the fellow behind the guns fault. Gun safety goes a long way. Is crawling behind a fan a good Idea? In my opinion no. But I don't condone gobbling either. People get shot just by moving their hands while calling. I hate to hear of anyone getting shot. There is no justification for not knowing your target. Sent from my SM-G800R4 using TapatalkExactly! While I would not feel safe doing it, and have never tried it (PA law is hunting by calling only) it is still insanely stupid to take a shot without knowing your target. I was taught to positively identity not one but several parts of an animal before even thinking of shooting. A few years ago an acquaintance killed a hen in the spring season. He said he heard a bird gobble and then saw something that "looked like a turkey" in the brush so he shot it. I told him he's lucky it wasn't another hunter that he shot. He didn't think that he did anything wrong! In the end, there is no excuse for not identifying your target. Not just the fan. The whole dang turkey!Have you ever shot one in the mountains when he peeps his head over? I have many times and will again I hope.
Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 22, 2017, 08:51:08 PMQuote from: Happy on February 22, 2017, 08:25:13 PMNo matter what actually happened it is still the fellow behind the guns fault. Gun safety goes a long way. Is crawling behind a fan a good Idea? In my opinion no. But I don't condone gobbling either. People get shot just by moving their hands while calling. I hate to hear of anyone getting shot. There is no justification for not knowing your target. Sent from my SM-G800R4 using TapatalkExactly! While I would not feel safe doing it, and have never tried it (PA law is hunting by calling only) it is still insanely stupid to take a shot without knowing your target. I was taught to positively identity not one but several parts of an animal before even thinking of shooting. A few years ago an acquaintance killed a hen in the spring season. He said he heard a bird gobble and then saw something that "looked like a turkey" in the brush so he shot it. I told him he's lucky it wasn't another hunter that he shot. He didn't think that he did anything wrong! In the end, there is no excuse for not identifying your target. Not just the fan. The whole dang turkey!
Quote from: Happy on February 22, 2017, 08:25:13 PMNo matter what actually happened it is still the fellow behind the guns fault. Gun safety goes a long way. Is crawling behind a fan a good Idea? In my opinion no. But I don't condone gobbling either. People get shot just by moving their hands while calling. I hate to hear of anyone getting shot. There is no justification for not knowing your target. Sent from my SM-G800R4 using Tapatalk
Quote from: Tail Feathers on February 23, 2017, 09:46:54 AMAny hunter using reaping as a technique should be smart enough to understand the risks. Any hunter shooting a turkey ought to be smart enough to positively identify his target as a real bird.Stupid can hurt.
Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 05:12:35 PMPA requires a visible beard. The fullest fan and wattlest head in the world are mean nothing here if there ain't a visible beard. I really can't believe that anyone is defending the potential shooter in a fanning accident. Not long ago I was nearly crucified by some people for saying that I have body shot turkeys at close range. Now it's ok to shoot for the fan?
Quote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 05:36:46 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 05:12:35 PMPA requires a visible beard. The fullest fan and wattlest head in the world are mean nothing here if there ain't a visible beard. I really can't believe that anyone is defending the potential shooter in a fanning accident. Not long ago I was nearly crucified by some people for saying that I have body shot turkeys at close range. Now it's ok to shoot for the fan? Did you even read the thread. First off, we're talking about VA not PA. Second many examples have been given where a beard, head, and fan can all be seen and the hunter behind the bird not. Fanning/reaping is what the discussion is about. If anyone just shoots a fan they never deserves a gun in the first place. But have you ever seen a DSD strutter?I bet I could fool you no problem with a DSD stutter if the grass was around 12" tall or with a slight hill, or some thicker underbrush of the later spring. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: WAGinVA on February 21, 2017, 09:29:41 AMJust FYI, I was looking at the VDGIF Board Agenda for tomorrow and the Board will act on a staff recommendation banning fanning/reaping. The rationale section indicates that there has been one fatality in VA that resulted from fanning, apparently two guys were hunting on private land and one shot the other. I had not heard anything about it before this.
Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 06:29:51 PMQuote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 05:36:46 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 05:12:35 PMPA requires a visible beard. The fullest fan and wattlest head in the world are mean nothing here if there ain't a visible beard. I really can't believe that anyone is defending the potential shooter in a fanning accident. Not long ago I was nearly crucified by some people for saying that I have body shot turkeys at close range. Now it's ok to shoot for the fan? Did you even read the thread. First off, we're talking about VA not PA. Second many examples have been given where a beard, head, and fan can all be seen and the hunter behind the bird not. Fanning/reaping is what the discussion is about. If anyone just shoots a fan they never deserves a gun in the first place. But have you ever seen a DSD strutter?I bet I could fool you no problem with a DSD stutter if the grass was around 12" tall or with a slight hill, or some thicker underbrush of the later spring. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkYes I read the post. I also read the post asking where a visible beard was required, hence my response. And this thread is about fanning, not dsd decoys. Did you read all the posts?
Quote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 07:43:27 PMQuote from: WAGinVA on February 21, 2017, 09:29:41 AMJust FYI, I was looking at the VDGIF Board Agenda for tomorrow and the Board will act on a staff recommendation banning fanning/reaping. The rationale section indicates that there has been one fatality in VA that resulted from fanning, apparently two guys were hunting on private land and one shot the other. I had not heard anything about it before this.Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 06:29:51 PMQuote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 05:36:46 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 05:12:35 PMPA requires a visible beard. The fullest fan and wattlest head in the world are mean nothing here if there ain't a visible beard. I really can't believe that anyone is defending the potential shooter in a fanning accident. Not long ago I was nearly crucified by some people for saying that I have body shot turkeys at close range. Now it's ok to shoot for the fan? Did you even read the thread. First off, we're talking about VA not PA. Second many examples have been given where a beard, head, and fan can all be seen and the hunter behind the bird not. Fanning/reaping is what the discussion is about. If anyone just shoots a fan they never deserves a gun in the first place. But have you ever seen a DSD strutter?I bet I could fool you no problem with a DSD stutter if the grass was around 12" tall or with a slight hill, or some thicker underbrush of the later spring. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkYes I read the post. I also read the post asking where a visible beard was required, hence my response. And this thread is about fanning, not dsd decoys. Did you read all the posts? Original post. See the second sentence, last word "reaping." Reaping is crawling behind a decoy to kill a turkey. DSD makes the best commercially available decoys. You said there was no way to be fooled. Given the right conditions, anyone on this forum could be fooled by a quality strutter decoy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 08:24:32 PMQuote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 07:43:27 PMQuote from: WAGinVA on February 21, 2017, 09:29:41 AMJust FYI, I was looking at the VDGIF Board Agenda for tomorrow and the Board will act on a staff recommendation banning fanning/reaping. The rationale section indicates that there has been one fatality in VA that resulted from fanning, apparently two guys were hunting on private land and one shot the other. I had not heard anything about it before this.Quote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 06:29:51 PMQuote from: beakbuster10 on February 23, 2017, 05:36:46 PMQuote from: Farmboy27 on February 23, 2017, 05:12:35 PMPA requires a visible beard. The fullest fan and wattlest head in the world are mean nothing here if there ain't a visible beard. I really can't believe that anyone is defending the potential shooter in a fanning accident. Not long ago I was nearly crucified by some people for saying that I have body shot turkeys at close range. Now it's ok to shoot for the fan? Did you even read the thread. First off, we're talking about VA not PA. Second many examples have been given where a beard, head, and fan can all be seen and the hunter behind the bird not. Fanning/reaping is what the discussion is about. If anyone just shoots a fan they never deserves a gun in the first place. But have you ever seen a DSD strutter?I bet I could fool you no problem with a DSD stutter if the grass was around 12" tall or with a slight hill, or some thicker underbrush of the later spring. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkYes I read the post. I also read the post asking where a visible beard was required, hence my response. And this thread is about fanning, not dsd decoys. Did you read all the posts? Original post. See the second sentence, last word "reaping." Reaping is crawling behind a decoy to kill a turkey. DSD makes the best commercially available decoys. You said there was no way to be fooled. Given the right conditions, anyone on this forum could be fooled by a quality strutter decoy. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf you can be fooled by a decoy then please don't come to PA. If that's the case then given the right conditions any hunting "accident" is ok. Turkeys move in a way no hunter can mimic. I'm not saying that I feel fanning or reaping is safe. I'm saying that there is no excuse whatsoever for not identifying your target. I have very limited time to hunt. Does that mean I pull the trigger on a fan? Nope. Does that mean I don't take the few seconds needed to confirm that it truely is a real turkey? Nope. Hunter excitement causes a lot of hunting accidents. If you can truely be fooled into shooting an object that isn't a real turkey, then you have to take a long hard look into how you can better prepare yourself for the excitement that can come with this deal.