registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by bowmike, May 29, 2013, 10:35:44 AM
Quote from: bowmike on May 29, 2013, 11:37:10 AMThanks guys. i will stick with what I have and spend the money on finding the best patterning load and choke combo. Just wanted to be sure that the only downfall was manuverability. I can deal with it. The only issues that are minor anyway arise when walking through thicker stuff.
Quote from: mikejd on May 29, 2013, 12:00:04 PMWith all the incredible chokes and ammo out there now its all a matter of confort and choice. My 18" barel easily puts in the 200'sin a 10" so Its all about comfort.
Quote from: BandedSpur on May 29, 2013, 12:12:59 PMQuote from: mikejd on May 29, 2013, 12:00:04 PMWith all the incredible chokes and ammo out there now its all a matter of confort and choice. My 18" barel easily puts in the 200'sin a 10" so Its all about comfort.With what....6s, 7s, MBs?
Quote from: mikejd on June 05, 2013, 06:30:12 AMQuote from: BandedSpur on May 29, 2013, 12:12:59 PMQuote from: mikejd on May 29, 2013, 12:00:04 PMWith all the incredible chokes and ammo out there now its all a matter of confort and choice. My 18" barel easily puts in the 200'sin a 10" so Its all about comfort.With what....6s, 7s, MBs?, 6's or 7's with a 3" shell they all break the 200 mark.7's obviosly put more hits then the 6's but I prefer 6's. Thats with a winchester1300 short (18" barrel)and a deep cleaned barrel. Going to polish her up and see what I can do.That said. With my other 1300 with a 22" barrel I put 260's in a 10" with #7's.So obviosly the longer barrel will perform better. But how dead Is dead.I opt for the shorter lighter more manuverable barels.
Quote from: BandedSpur on June 05, 2013, 08:30:51 AMQuote from: mikejd on June 05, 2013, 06:30:12 AMQuote from: BandedSpur on May 29, 2013, 12:12:59 PMQuote from: mikejd on May 29, 2013, 12:00:04 PMWith all the incredible chokes and ammo out there now its all a matter of confort and choice. My 18" barel easily puts in the 200'sin a 10" so Its all about comfort.With what....6s, 7s, MBs?, 6's or 7's with a 3" shell they all break the 200 mark.7's obviosly put more hits then the 6's but I prefer 6's. Thats with a winchester1300 short (18" barrel)and a deep cleaned barrel. Going to polish her up and see what I can do.That said. With my other 1300 with a 22" barrel I put 260's in a 10" with #7's.So obviosly the longer barrel will perform better. But how dead Is dead.I opt for the shorter lighter more manuverable barels.That is impressive, getting over 200 with 3" 6s from that short barrel. Congrats.
Quote from: natman on June 07, 2013, 09:02:32 AMLong vs short barrel:Velocity: You'll lose about 50-75 fps going from a 28" to a 20". Not really enough to worry about.Patterns: Pattern is primarily dependent on choke. If there is any difference, again not enough to worry about. Noise: A 20" barrel is 5 - 6 db louder than a 28". This is enough to be perceived as much louder if you're not wearing hearing protection. If you are (and you should), no problem. I don't like to carry a 28" barrel shotgun around in the woods for the same reasons I don't like to carry a 28" long barreled rifle in the woods. You can carry a 20" slung on your shoulder with the barrel lower than your head. It's just easier to deal with and handier to carry. I started with a 28" barreled Mossberg 500. After a few years with it I got a 20" barrel and I'm not going back.