registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by busta biggun, July 05, 2011, 02:30:16 PM
Quote from: guesswho on July 05, 2011, 05:22:29 PMQuote from: sugarray on July 05, 2011, 02:53:56 PMRemember it is not whether or not she truly did it, it is whether the state can PROVE it.The last Judge she will have to face has a different set of rules. Unfricking believable!
Quote from: sugarray on July 05, 2011, 02:53:56 PMRemember it is not whether or not she truly did it, it is whether the state can PROVE it.
Quote from: Old Gobbler on July 05, 2011, 08:47:06 PMShe is living on borrowed time, and borrowed money She will end up back in jail , insane asylum , or found dead in some hotel room a couple years from now from drugs or some other ill gotten manner - Likely she will have mental problems from all the stress , and hounding from the press- these news guys are going to hound her till the gates of hell - we are talking night and day phone calls , around the clock surveillance , the will keep on her until she cracks - Not to mention the folks that would like to take a 600 yard shot at herShe will have to change her name and move to Mars to keep away from them - other than that I don't see any employment opportunities other than "working the street"[/quotI agree, to the victor go the spoils .
Quote from: bird on July 05, 2011, 07:57:27 PMThere is nothing wrong with the system folks and it is working exactly the way it is suppose to. The prosecution has to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that she killed her own daughter. The prosecution failed to do that plain and simple. I firmly believe that she is guilty as sin for killing her daughter but you can't find a person guilty on speculation and beliefs. You have to have proof and so until then a person is presumed innocent. I surely hope that Caylee is resting in Peace, God Bless Her Soul.
Quote from: joey46 on July 07, 2011, 06:59:24 PMOur founding fathers must be spinning in their graves. A mental competency test should be included during the jury selection phase in these high profile cases. At very least they should be asked to explain their concept of the difference between "reasonable doubt" and "shadow of a doubt" before being considered. This should have applied to the 12 dimwits on the OJ jury as well. There is no reasonable reason to stuff a dead 2 year old into a trash bag and then lie about it for months unless you participated in her death.