registration is free , easy and welcomed !!!
Started by Kywoodsman, May 03, 2016, 08:24:33 PM
Quote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 01:17:43 PM How hard is it for people to just keep quiet and stop trying to change everyone and everything to fit their personal mold ?
Quote from: silvestris on May 04, 2016, 03:13:19 PMQuote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 01:17:43 PM How hard is it for people to just keep quiet and stop trying to change everyone and everything to fit their personal mold ?...cheating on a test.
Quote from: Bill Cooksey on May 04, 2016, 01:38:40 PMQuote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 01:17:43 PMOff the fan subject but arent limits set within deemed safe percentages of the population? Limits are set to encompass limits being potentially reached by everyone even though that would never occur. Not in the majority of cases. They are set to limit the take of the small percentage of those who regularly reach a limit, and, in the case of some species, limit the daily take when conditions come together where you could kill far more. This is done to keep the take by hunters compensatory rather than additive. If suddenly those who are normally less successful become more successful, the scale can slip to additive. At that point there are concerns about the sustainability of the resource. For instance, if duck hunters actually killed a limit of ducks every day, ducks would be extinct in North America in less than thirty days. If turkey hunters in TN all killed a limit of male turkeys this season, there would be zero male turkeys left in the state. Same can be said of deer. Take a look at population estimates in a given state. Then, add the number of hunters and multiply by the number of animals which could be legally taken. The math doesn't work out.Method of take is one of the few factors humans control in the scenario, but it is a very significant factor.[/quote Amen and i'm glad you know how to spell Safety...
Quote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 01:17:43 PMOff the fan subject but arent limits set within deemed safe percentages of the population? Limits are set to encompass limits being potentially reached by everyone even though that would never occur.
Quote from: Greg Massey on May 03, 2016, 08:40:29 PMI don't think you will get many positive feed backs about fanning. You may need to ask this on another forum. First off the safety factory is one thing .. so you may wants to reading others respond in this forum on fanning. Good Luck also.
Quote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 04:47:38 PMQuote from: Greg Massey on May 03, 2016, 08:40:29 PMI don't think you will get many positive feed backs about fanning. You may need to ask this on another forum. First off the safety factory is one thing .. so you may wants to reading others respond in this forum on fanning. Good Luck also.The spelling police might want to work on proper grammar
Quote from: duxrus on May 04, 2016, 05:17:10 PMSorry but I couldnt resist.We all need to get back To chasing birds and using tags
Quote from: snapper1982 on May 03, 2016, 10:40:52 PMYes OP it is for the same reasons some birds dont like decoys much. Quote from: Greg Massey on May 03, 2016, 08:40:29 PMI don't think you will get many positive feed backs about fanning. You may need to ask this on another forum. First off the safety factory is one thing .. so you may wants to reading others respond in this forum on fanning. Good Luck also.As i have said many times for all you people who bring up saftey. You better just stop turkey hunting. I bet you walk and use calls huh. Guess what, people get shot every year doing both of those and yet you are fine with doing them yet no reports of a fanning shooting and everyone wants to cry about saftey! You try to fit the saftey issue to use it against fanning/reaping and yet ignore the facts about turkey hunting accidents.
Quote from: Bill Cooksey on May 04, 2016, 09:17:59 PMNothing wrong with your question at all. Sportsmen should be able to discuss differing points of view.