only use regular PayPal to provide purchase protection
Started by savduck, March 10, 2012, 10:54:35 PM
Quote from: savduck on March 12, 2012, 09:42:38 AMI think all you guys get it, but are over thinking what I put up.My whole point in the thread was to show that a gun that is sighted in dead on, can, due to human error at 40 or longer yardages, cripple birds. Thats it nothing more.
Quote from: wmahunter on March 12, 2012, 08:27:31 AMIF the thread title were "A picture to support NO SUPER TIGHT PATTERNS" then I could understand, BUT the picture and discussion do not show an issue with "LONG SHOTS". I don't agree with long shots either (farther than your gun/load/pattern will cleanly kill) but the picture and story here simply do not support that argument IMO....he has a very good killing pattern in the picture...just off on the POI which has nothing to do with distance.Hevi, I agree with you that a big dense pattern is better than a small dense pattern however this still has nothing to do with distance....only accuracy.
Quote from: 3" 870 Shell Shucker on March 13, 2012, 08:52:43 AMPlaying Devil's Advocate here:At a greater distance than what you patterned at, the pattern would open up a little and become a more forgiving "hunting" pattern. Your near miss was so critical because your pattern was so tight. If 40 Yards, plus a little cushion for yardage misjudgement is the maximum range, why not open your pattern up a little and make it more forgiving?