BAMA OR LSU WINNER TO DECIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

[REBELYELL]

"An Alabama victory was followed by a win by the democratic nominee, while a win by LSU signaled the Republican candidate being voted into office. It has been accurate for the past seven elections.

1984: LSU 16, Alabama 14. Ronald Reagan (R) demolishes Walter Mondale (D).
1988: LSU 19, Alabama 18. George H.W. Bush (R) defeats Michael Dukakis (D).
1992: Alabama 31, LSU 11. Bill Clinton (D) defeats George H.W. Bush (R).
1996: Alabama 26, LSU 0. Clinton (D) defeats Bob Dole (R).
2000: LSU 30, Alabama 28. George W. Bush (R) defeats Al Gore (D).
2004: LSU 26, Alabama 10. George W. Bush (R) defeats John Kerry (D).
2008: Alabama 27, LSU 21. Barack Obama (D) defeats John McCain (R).

[slamman]

GO TIGERS

[Gut_Pile]

I'm not a fan of either team. Saying that, before I saw this I would have to say I would prefer a win by the tide bc I despise LSU and most of their fan base. But if a Bama win means four more years of Barry then go tigers

[Flydown]

ROLL TIDE! The election ain't got crap to do with the butt whooping that LSU has coming tomorrow. ROLL TIDE ROLL and go Mitt and Ryan! Amen!

[Old Gobbler]

Guess I'll be watching that game! 

[Saltbayou]

Geaux Tigers!

[tomstopper]

If this even has the slightest chance to predict our countries future, then let go LSU

[Tail Feathers]

Since most LSU players are felons and can't vote I guess it will be Bama...

[BamaProud]

Time to break that trend.  Roll Tide.

[turkey slayer]

not much of a butt whooping, I thought it was a great game even though we lost.

[Turkey Trot]

In contrast, consider the home loss by the Washington Redskins.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2012/11/04/nfl-redskins-rule-romney/1681023/