Just wondering if anyone has any experience with Mag Blend 4,5,7?
I went to the store yesterday, asked for 5,6,7 and the guy gave me 4,5,7. I was a dummy and didn't pay much attention to the box. Didn't notice until I got home. Just trying to decided to try an exchange of just shoot them.
I changed chokes this year, just got a Rob Roberts .655 for my SBE11. I talked to Rob about the 5,6,7 and was going to give them a whirl. I don't have any experience with either loads, have always shot Winchester. I just know for the money, I want to make the best decision I can. Thanks for any advice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't aware Hevi-13 offered a 4,5,7 combo.
Yes, in catalogs I see the 4x5x7 and the 5x6x7 combos offered. My son shoots the 5x6x7 combo in his SBE 2 with a Rhino 660. It kills on both ends. Serious recoil. But it kills turkeys.
They are this year. Curious to hear what numbers you get.
Hopefully someone will have some info, I read an old post that said the pattern wasn't as dense, if that's the case I would like to try to exchange them. Kind of unsure what to do with them. I guess I should pay more attention
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Contact Clark (allaboutshooting) he has some info on these..he has a website
They should be fine. I have shot them in my gun and the kids youth 20 for the past two years and they have killed turkeys just fine.
Only problem I have noticed us those #7 shots are harder to find in the breast and I have found more than a couple with my teeth. I'm switching back to Longbeards #5 for that reason andc that reason only.
Until you shoot them yourself out of your gun you won't know. Every gun tends to shoot slightly different than another even if someone has your exact setup. I myself didn't like the blend compared to straight 6's. Both patterns were better than what I had been using but the blend had holes in the pattern more so than the 6's
Quote from: duxrus on March 13, 2016, 03:29:39 PM
Until you shoot them yourself out of your gun you won't know. Every gun tends to shoot slightly different than another even if someone has your exact setup. I myself didn't like the blend compared to straight 6's. Both patterns were better than what I had been using but the blend had holes in the pattern more so than the 6's
Yeah, I understand that, just looking to see if there is a common thread between folks that have tried both.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wasn't aware of that combo either and have shot magblends for years. I know the 5,6,7 blend shoots great and recoil to me isn't as bad as other loads and I shoot a mossberg for what that tells you.
My M3500 shoots the 3.5" Magblends great with a Sumtoy. Wasn't aware there were two. I'll have to check mine and see what they are.
The blends don't make any sense to me. If the concept is that the smaller shot size is supposed to fill in the pattern at longer ranges, why not use all #7's. The max range you should shoot at would be the range you think #7's are effective at. What purpose is there to have larger shot mixed in?
Quote from: chow hound on March 14, 2016, 12:19:38 AM
The blends don't make any sense to me. If the concept is that the smaller shot size is supposed to fill in the pattern at longer ranges, why not use all #7's. The max range you should shoot at would be the range you think #7's are effective at. What purpose is there to have larger shot mixed in?
marketing
If these were made by Federal, everyone would think they were the greatest thing ever offered, but because they're made by Hevishot, they're automatically junk.
I've been shooting the Mag blends since they came out because they pattern the best out of my gun. They pattern better than the straight 6's. The 7's had higher numbers, but not as even a pattern, and I wasn't pleased with the performance of the 7's on live birds.
I could care less what's printed on the outside. I shoot what patterns best, and it was Mag Blend.
If you weren't happy with #7 performance on live birds, then shouldn't you ignore every #7 hole in the paper when evaluating your pattern?
Call em in close and don't worry about it! :z-guntootsmiley:
Quote from: chow hound on March 14, 2016, 10:10:53 AM
If you weren't happy with #7 performance on live birds, then shouldn't you ignore every #7 hole in the paper when evaluating your pattern?
No, because it had more to do with the density of the pattern at close distances.
Quote from: chow hound on March 14, 2016, 12:19:38 AM
The blends don't make any sense to me. If the concept is that the smaller shot size is supposed to fill in the pattern at longer ranges, why not use all #7's. The max range you should shoot at would be the range you think #7's are effective at. What purpose is there to have larger shot mixed in?
I don't know about anyone else, but straight #7 are not legal in Maine, but the 5, 6, and 7 are legal, so I use the Mag blends to get a denser pattern. They work great for me out of my Browning with a .665 IC.
I shoo the blends out of my 870 with IC .660. Patterns great for me as well.
Quote from: trackerbucky on March 14, 2016, 11:26:03 AM
Quote from: chow hound on March 14, 2016, 12:19:38 AM
The blends don't make any sense to me. If the concept is that the smaller shot size is supposed to fill in the pattern at longer ranges, why not use all #7's. The max range you should shoot at would be the range you think #7's are effective at. What purpose is there to have larger shot mixed in?
I don't know about anyone else, but straight #7 are not legal in Maine, but the 5, 6, and 7 are legal, so I use the Mag blends to get a denser pattern. They work great for me out of my Browning with a .665 IC.
that is one silly rule .
Quote from: chow hound on March 14, 2016, 12:19:38 AM
The blends don't make any sense to me. If the concept is that the smaller shot size is supposed to fill in the pattern at longer ranges, why not use all #7's. The max range you should shoot at would be the range you think #7's are effective at. What purpose is there to have larger shot mixed in?
Kills em extra dead instead of just regular dead
So I decided to give Rob Roberts Gun Works a call about the loads. They told me from their experience, the 4,5,7s did not pattern near as well as the 5,6,7s. That was good enough for me. The store worked with me and I made the switch yesterday afternoon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Hooksfan on March 13, 2016, 02:04:17 PM
They should be fine. I have shot them in my gun and the kids youth 20 for the past two years and they have killed turkeys just fine.
Only problem I have noticed us those #7 shots are harder to find in the breast and I have found more than a couple with my teeth. I'm switching back to Longbeards #5 for that reason andc that reason only.
You haven't shot the Mag Blends 4,5,7 load for the last 2 years because they are new this year. And rumor has it that Environmetal had a stockpile of HeviShot #4's so they decided this would be a way to reduce that inventory. It stands to reason that they will not pattern as well as the 5,6,7 loads due to having 4's instead of 5's, thus having less pellets.
Quote from: Spyder on March 13, 2016, 10:39:18 AM
Just wondering if anyone has any experience with Mag Blend 4,5,7?
I went to the store yesterday, asked for 5,6,7 and the guy gave me 4,5,7. I was a dummy and didn't pay much attention to the box. Didn't notice until I got home. Just trying to decided to try an exchange of just shoot them.
I changed chokes this year, just got a Rob Roberts .655 for my SBE11. I talked to Rob about the 5,6,7 and was going to give them a whirl. I don't have any experience with either loads, have always shot Winchester. I just know for the money, I want to make the best decision I can. Thanks for any advice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry, I just saw this post about the "new" Magnum Blend shells. I published and article about them on April 10, 2015.
Here's a link http://allaboutshooting.com/blogs/blog/98747527-new-magnum-blend-shotshels-from-hevi-shot
I hope that helps some.
Thanks,
Clark