Turkey hunting forum for turkey hunting tips

General Discussion => General Forum => Topic started by: Kaleb978 on April 13, 2025, 11:27:19 PM

Title: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Kaleb978 on April 13, 2025, 11:27:19 PM
This is not a hate thread, I am just curious. How many of you go through the process of scoring your bird and submitting the score to NWTF?
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Notsoyoungturk on April 13, 2025, 11:38:51 PM
I do not
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: joey46 on April 14, 2025, 02:50:33 AM
No.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: eggshell on April 14, 2025, 03:43:54 AM
I have never submitted a bird and no plans to
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: ruination on April 14, 2025, 04:55:33 AM
Silly money grab for records that no one really cares about but yourself.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Kaleb978 on April 14, 2025, 07:46:47 AM
This is mostly what I expected. I am a member along with several of my friends and we have never heard of anyone submitting a score.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Dougas on April 14, 2025, 08:43:32 AM
I have killed some that would score pretty high and never had them officially scored.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: bpsmag1026 on April 14, 2025, 08:56:43 AM
I never have
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: GobbleNut on April 14, 2025, 09:17:08 AM
Over the decades, I have scored a lot of turkeys with the Dave Harbour scoring system (the NWTF took over the records from Harbour a few years after he started it). I have admittedly submitted one gobbler to the records decades ago...only to recognize the turkey itself.

Although I think the scoring system is seriously flawed and, as such. has limited value in comparing wild turkeys, it does provide a "barometer" for hunters to evaluate a gobbler's "standing", if you will, to other gobblers a hunter may have harvested and/or in comparing the relative "trophy characteristics" of a gobbler from a given area or region.

At this point in time, I agree that the NWTF uses the record book for turkeys as a money grab. Unless things have changed, any hunter can submit a gobbler, regardless of its size, to the record book as long as the submission is accompanied by the "fee" for doing so. (Most game-animal scoring systems have some sort of minimum score to be eligible for inclusion...not so with this one as far as I know...you shoot a jake and want it put in the record book, send in your money...  ;D 

Having said all of the above, the Harbour scoring system, to my knowledge, is the only one in use for scoring (and comparing) wild turkeys. I don't think enough people care enough about scoring turkeys to come up with something better, so we are "stuck" with this one. ...But if someone wants to get in the record book, more power to them...go for it (just make sure you submit the proper dollars for it)...  :icon_thumright:  ;D  :D



Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: cannonball on April 14, 2025, 09:26:46 AM
The only time I have scored a turkey is for the team contest here on the forum. I haven't submitted anything to the NWTF and don't plan on doing so in the future
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Lcmacd 58 on April 14, 2025, 10:10:38 AM
Never have
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: joey46 on April 14, 2025, 10:35:58 AM
See post #8 -  I'm a hoarder by choice so this was easy to find.  I submitted an Osceola to FWC back in 2008 for an Outstanding Gobbler Certificate.  This bird deserved it but, as usual, was a right time, right place kill. 
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: GobbleNut on April 14, 2025, 12:11:09 PM
Quote from: joey46 on April 14, 2025, 10:35:58 AMSee post #8 -  I'm a hoarder by choice so this was easy to find.  I submitted an Osceola to FWC back in 2008 for an Outstanding Gobbler Certificate.  This bird deserved it but, as usual, was a right time, right place kill. 

I think we are showing our age, Joey.  I've got the same book...and in about the same condition.  ;D  I assume Col. Dave put the inscription on the page?  That would be pretty cool. 

I've got this one, as well. I think this included the first edition of the records when the bookkeeping was taken over by the NWTF, as I recall.
(https://i.imgur.com/KmAS4LRm.jpg?2)
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: joey46 on April 14, 2025, 12:24:03 PM
I'm sure he did.  It says to hurry up and make a submission as the first record book would be out in 1982.  Still enjoy the chapter on his contact with a very young Harold Knight in LBL.  Time flies.  Good memories.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Kaleb978 on April 15, 2025, 11:11:43 AM
Interesting thoughts. Thank you to all who answered.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: OJR on April 15, 2025, 05:51:38 PM
I have had a few scored in friendly pools on hunting trips.
Had a Rio near Coleman, TX back in 2009, that was a good one. He won me enough for gas money home! But I never thought to have one entered.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Dougas on April 15, 2025, 09:16:52 PM
Living on the Oregon central coast, my brother and I have taken many black tailed deer and Roosevelt's elk. Several of our deer officially scored higher than the the minimum and my brother's first elk official score would have made it #19 in Pope and Young. We never entered any of them. We just wanted to know the score. Then when I became a full time taxidermist, I learned how to score them for my personal use and for customers, so that they would know if they should get it officially scored.  Same with turkeys. I retired from the taxidermy trade, but still score my turkeys just for my personal use. Personall i feel no need to enter them.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: eggshell on April 16, 2025, 07:09:04 AM
I don't think a trophy score signifies a trophy turkey in any way. It's only a measure of physical parameters that are solely genetic and food related. Just because a gobbler is big bodied and has long spurs and beard doesn't mean anything about how hard he was to outsmart. Look around at all animals, especially people. Is a man smarter and wiser just because he is 6'5", 275, and muscled up? Secondly I think trophy recognition only brings the worse out in people. I understand the desire to recognize genetic exceptions as exceptional examples of physical traits, but it means squat about the survival skills of the animal. I doubt I will ever register an animal. I just believe trophy hunting brings out the worse in our communities.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: joey46 on April 16, 2025, 07:38:12 AM
I have always cringed at "big buck" and "heaviest turkey" contest that were pretty common in Ohio, at a local level, when I started out.  When all was said and done it was alleged a whole lot of cheating took place.  Competition can bring out the worst in some.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: albrubacker on April 16, 2025, 07:39:03 AM
I only ever had one scored, mainly to honor the bird. Had some history with it.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: eggshell on April 16, 2025, 08:23:45 AM
Your right Joey, They have a contest locally here and I done it the first year just as a favor to my buddy (it was a a team thing) and regretted it. It changed the whole season for me and I have never done it again. When I was younger the local NWTF chapter had a contest and I always entered. It was just for chapter members and for fun, no prizes except a local maker made a call trophy for the winner. I play in this OG contest and enjoy it because it is just for fun and comradery. I have made some new friends through it. It's absolutely not about the trophy here but the people. I am glad OG set it up this way.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: bbcoach on April 16, 2025, 10:46:26 AM
Maybe if I had a bird with 2 inch spurs and 5 beards I might but other than that NO.  A bird like that would be newsworthy and I would have to have it mounted.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: jhoward11 on April 16, 2025, 11:35:21 AM
Only score to compete with my hunting buddies.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: RutnNStrutn on April 16, 2025, 12:11:25 PM
Never have and never will.
Title: Re: NWTF "scoring"
Post by: Dr Juice on April 16, 2025, 02:52:16 PM
Quote from: RutnNStrutn on April 16, 2025, 12:11:25 PMNever have and never will.
Same here.