![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Recent posts #3
General Forum / Re: Canadian questionLast post by crow - Today at 09:22:11 PMIsn't a 9 upside down a 6
#4
General Forum / Re: Canadian questionLast post by Swampmonkey - Today at 06:33:03 PMUnderstand. Thanks guys for the response.
#5
General Forum / Re: Canadian questionLast post by Lcmacd 58 - Today at 06:08:40 PMCanadian CO's are very much by the book.
#6
General Forum / Re: Remington 11-87 realtree x...Last post by Woodleyrd - Today at 05:02:28 PMProbably was an exclusive production run for a specific gun distributor. They do that kind of stuff all the time for large distributors.
#7
General Forum / Re: Canadian questionLast post by Woodleyrd - Today at 05:00:44 PMHaving dealt with Canadian game wardens on a fly in fishing trip, I would follow the rules exactly. They checked our camp and boats for daily and possession limits. We were 200 miles from the nearest road and only camp on the lake. They came in by float plane.
#8
General Forum / Re: Remington 11-87 realtree x...Last post by Tom007 - Today at 04:47:41 PMI've seen the Realtree Extra brown in the Special Purpose 870, not the 1187. They made very few of the 870's, I'm sure the 1187's were also limited production. You have a good one there for sure.
#9
General Forum / Re: Word Association GameLast post by Lcmacd 58 - Today at 04:07:26 PMEnlighten
#10
General Forum / Canadian questionLast post by Swampmonkey - Today at 04:06:39 PMLong story short I'm headed north of the border this May to get in one last hunt. Ontario regulations say #7 shot or larger. Is this actually enforced or do the wardens up there have enough sense to know #9 tss is more than capable? I know back when a few states we hunted had those rules nobody ever asked the question. Not really interested in loading up any 7's but will if it's strictly enforced. Thanks for any replies.
|